JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 5, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Claudia Angela Navarro Acevedo

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se confirmó en su integridad el auto mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda interpuesta por la ciudadana de la referencia, quien demandó la inexequibilidad parcial del Art. 11 de la Ley 505 de 1999.

La Corte constató que el cargo que la demandante propone, fue resuelto en la Sentencia C-1371/00, en conclusión, no sólo la cosa juzgada que ampara la citada sentencia no es relativa sino que el asunto analizado en ella versa sobre el cargo elevado por la actora.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. CONFIRMAR en su integridad el Auto de agosto trece (13) de 2002, proferido por el magistrado sustanciador en el proceso de la referencia, Alfredo Beltran Sierra, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda interpuesta por la ciudadana Claudia Angela Navarro Acevedo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.